- #PHL BDM4065 DRIVER FOR MAC MAC OS#
- #PHL BDM4065 DRIVER FOR MAC FULL#
- #PHL BDM4065 DRIVER FOR MAC PLUS#
Do note the 70-72hz I am suggesting for the 3840x1440 and not 4k.
I purchased my monitor in Australia and not sure of T-Con versions as of yet, if you have further issues I am more than happy to pull mine apart to give a T-Con version but first try the other methods. This will generally be the first 2 entries if you google "pixel clock patcher", I always run it when attempting to overclock a panel or change drivers.Īlso try downing it to 70-72hz as well to see if that works and move from there.
Also I use R9 290x, not sure if that has an effect.did you also run the pixel clock patcher for NVidia flavor?. I used LCD standard when setting the resolution and refresh in CRU (make sure you use CRU, much better than nvidia cp), also set 1.2 DP in the monitor. Hey mate sorry for the late reply am currently at work (80 hour weeks ftl).
But I'm betting that whatever interconnect comes next will have a new connector since the marginal improvement of DP 1.3 suggests that the current ones seem to have topped out. Or I suppose an 8K display could do what Dell's current 5K display is doing - require two dedicated DisplayPort connections (not MST), which in this case would have to be 1.3. Of course DP 1.3 can achieve an equivalent 80 Gbps with compression that it now supports (similar to what you see with USB video docking stations), but that will cut into some of the sharpness that you'd otherwise experience. 8K 60 Hz with 8-bit color and 2D requires 50 Gbps to deliver uncompressed. DP 1.2 supports 17.28 Gbps after subtracting overhead, and despite arriving 5 years later, DP 1.3 only bumps that up to 25.92, enough to cover 5K 60 Hz.
#PHL BDM4065 DRIVER FOR MAC PLUS#
It's not quite the same as a 27" 1440p vs 5K display because you can sit closer to a 27" display than a 40" display without parts of the display being outside your field of vision, which in turn means that increased resolution will be more apparent - plus 8K is 2.25x as many pixels as 5K, so you're talking about perceiving a whole lot more resolution than a 27" 5K panel while also sitting farther away.Īnd lastly, I think another big problem with 8K (other than GPU horsepower and of course cost) assuming you want 60 Hz will be the interconnect.
#PHL BDM4065 DRIVER FOR MAC FULL#
So seeing the full benefit of 8K, which is 4x that of 4K, will require you to view it from.maybe 1 foot away? How reasonable is that? I imagine owners aren't sitting closer than 2.5 feet to these displays, in which case they wouldn't see ANY benefit of an 8K 40" display. Granted the chart will be less accurate at the resolutions and viewing distances we're talking about, but as you can see, even seeing the full benefit of 4K, which is 4x the resolution of 1080p, requires that on a 40" display you drop your viewing distance from 4 feet to about 2.5 feet. It also helps that they control both the hardware ecosystem and the OS, so using them to compare to Microsoft isn't quite apples to apples (har har).īut I think the viewing distance point raised above relates to this chart.
#PHL BDM4065 DRIVER FOR MAC MAC OS#
Apple can provide a much better scaling experience because they didn't provide any scaling in Mac OS at all before Retina, so they only had to introduce scaling support for 200%, which is much more easily accomplished than supporting an arbitrary scale factor like Windows does. A big reason people have been interested in this panel in the first place is that it allows you to use 4K without any scaling. The point was that for Windows, 200% scaling can be a nightmare because not every application - or even every aspect of Windows - scales nicely or even scales at all, so beauty might be trumped by a loss of functionality on an 8K version of this display.
0 kommentar(er)
